Archive | January 31, 2012

Justice vital for peace: Ahmadinejad

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

 

IRAN  —  Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has stressed the importance of promoting justice for the establishment of peace and security for all nations.

All nations are in need of peace, security, freedom, progress and welfare; it is necessary to enhance cooperation, communication and collective efforts for such wishes to materialize, said President Ahmadinejad in an address to the inauguration ceremony of Iran’s Spanish-language Hispan TV channel on Tuesday.

He stressed the important role that the media play in connecting all nations and human beings and establishing the means of contact and communication among them.

Media can act as a means for reflecting [humans'] requirements and needs, the knowledge and science, he stated.

President Ahmadinejad warned that an absolute bullying and selfish minority has decided to impose its will on the majority of the world people.

He stressed that close communications, exchange of views, and unity are of significance for protecting the basic rights of people, adding that the media can play a crucial role in this regard.

The Iranian president added that Hispan TV must be the flag-bearer of reality, affection and justice and also convey the message of peace, friendship and freedom for all nations.

The channel should make efforts in order to get the people united, foster friendship and also eliminate the grounds for the domineering policies of the bullying powers, he pointed out.

Ahmadinejad expressed hope the Hispan TV would act as a rendezvous point so that all justice- and freedom-seekers, independent nations, thinkers, scholars, artists and politicians would have the opportunity to engage in dialogue and exchange of information.

The Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) on Tuesday officially launched the 24/7 Hispan TV channel, which broadcasts a wide range of entertainment, news, and educational programs.

The TV channel had earlier gone on air for a limited broadcast in December.

Hispan TV is the third specialized channel launched by the IRIB after the Arabic language Al-Alam television network and the 24-hour English-language Press TV.   (*)

 

 

SOURCE : PRESS TV.IR

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

German Chancellor Angela Merkel to urge China to cut Iran oil imports: source

German Chancellor Angela Merkel

 

BERLIN (Reuters)  —  German Chancellor Angela Merkel will use a planned visit to China this week to encourage Beijing to reduce its imports of Iranian oil, a German government source said on Tuesday.

Last week, the European Union agreed to ban from July 1 all imports of oil from Iran, OPEC’s second largest producer, in a drive to pressure Tehran into reining in its nuclear activities.

“It is in German interests that China does not raise its imports (from Iran). It would be good if China would reduce its imports,” the government source told a news briefing ahead of Merkel’s trip to China that begins on Wednesday.

China has criticized the EU ban, saying it is “not a constructive approach.”

Beijing, the world’s second largest crude consumer, has long opposed unilateral sanctions that target Iran’s energy sector and has tried to reduce tensions that could threaten its oil supply.

The 27-nation EU delayed until July the entry into force of the oil import ban because it also wants to avoid penalizing the ailing economies of Italy, Greece and others for whom Iran is a major oil supplier.

The EU strategy will be reviewed in May to see whether it should go ahead.

Western powers accuse Iran of planning to build nuclear weapons. Tehran says its nuclear program is for purely peaceful purposes.   (*)

 

 

SOURCE :  REUTERS

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Top U.S. spies to face grilling on Taliban, Iran talks

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

WASHINGTON (Reuters)   —  The possible release of detainedTaliban leaders is likely to join Iran’s nuclear ambitions at the top of a busy agenda when the top seven American intelligence chiefs testify before the Congress this week.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper — as well as the heads of the CIA, FBI, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Counterterrorism Center and State and Homeland Securitydepartment intelligence units — will be grilled on “worldwide threats” at a pair of open hearings.

The hearings — before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday and its House of Representatives counterpart on Thursday — are an annual ritual. But they offer a rare opportunity for legislators publicly to raise sensitive national security topics that are usually discussed only in secret briefings.

Lawmakers have expressed concern about the Obama administration’s efforts to engage in peace talks with the Afghan Taliban, including consideration of the release of five Taliban leaders incarcerated at Guantanamo as a “confidence building” gesture, sources close to the committee said.

Senator Saxby Chambliss, Republican vice chairman of the Senate intelligence committee, told Reuters at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week that he and the panel’s Democratic chairwoman,Senator Dianne Feinstein, had twice written to the Obama administration “raising strong objections” to the proposed move, which purportedly would involve the release of the Taliban prisoners into Afghan government custody.

Chambliss said he and Feinstein first wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. “We’ve gotten a response” from Clinton, he said, declining to discuss the classified contents of her letter.

But he hinted that Clinton’s response did not mollify them, adding that he and Feinstein then wrote a second letter to President Barack Obama.

Chambliss said there was “every reason to believe” some of the five Taliban detainees were involved in the death of CIA officer Johnny Micheal Spann during an uprising by Taliban prisoners at a fortress outside the Afghan city of Mazar-i-Sharif in November 2001.

“I think it’s bad policy. We don’t negotiate with terrorists. We never have,” Chambliss said, calling the detainees “five of the meanest, nastiest killers in the world.”

Two detainees slated for possible release, former senior Taliban army commanders Mohammed Fazl and Noorullah Noori, were held at the historic Qala-i-Jangi fortress outside Mazar-i-Sharif when the prison revolt erupted in 2001.

But a senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, insisted earlier this month that he knew of no evidence that they were involved in the death of Spann, who was surrounded and killed by rioting prisoners.

CONGRESS NOT NOTIFIED

Chambliss said Obama had not yet notified Congress of the administration’s plan to transfer the prisoners from Guantanamo, a step which is required by a law which the president signed on December 31.

“It’s the president’s call. There’s an ongoing conversation about it, let me say that,” said Chambliss. To date, all discussions the Administration has had with Congress on the prisoner transfer issue have taken place behind closed doors.

Iran’s nuclear progress and threats to Persian Gulf shipping and U.S. interests are almost certain to be key topics of discussion, with U.S. intelligence officials expected to offer a less alarming take on Iranian activity than those voiced by some conservative and Israeli analysts.

U.S. officials have told Reuters they believe that Iran’s leaders have not yet made a decision to build nuclear weapons, an assessment which the U.S. intelligence community has held since it published extracts of a controversial National Intelligence Estimate on the issue in 2007.

U.S. officials say the reason Iranian leaders have not made a decision to build a bomb is because they are still weighing the costs and benefits of doing so.

But while a lot of what Iran is doing in its nuclear program has civilian applications, U.S. officials also believe that Tehran is keeping its options open regarding the building of a bomb — adding to the air of ambiguity surrounding Iran’s intentions and dealings with the U.S. and the outside world.

Other subjects which officials said might come up during this week’s hearings are the stability of North Korea’s regime and the future of its nuclear program after the death last month of Kim Jong-il and his replacement by his son Kim Jong-un; the recent discovery by authorities in Thailand of possible stockpiling of bomb-making materials by an individual with alleged links to the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah; and drug-related violence and instability in Mexico.

The activities of homegrown U.S. militants could also be raised at the hearings. The FBI and other domestic law enforcement agencies have been particularly concerned about “lone wolf” militants who become radicalized via the internet and plot violence without catching the attention of authorities.

“We have to constantly be vigilant against a range of threats. Terrorism didn’t begin with (Osama) bin Laden, it’s not over with his death. There are other al Qaeda, al Qaeda-related groups, and we have the growth of homegrown extremists,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on Monday.

Last week in Baltimore, a man pleaded guilty to attempting to bomb a military recruiting center. Investigators said he had no connection to international militants but had been trying unsuccessfully to recruit others to join his plot until he was trapped by authorities in a “sting” operation.

Earlier in January, a home-grown militant in Tampa was arrested in connection with a plot to car-bomb nightclubs and then attack crowds of onlookers with guns or a suicide vest.  (*)

 

 

SOURCE : REUTERS

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

IAEA to wrap up Iran visit, US eyes more sanctions

File photo of the reactor building at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran. Iran has voiced willingness to resume talks with world powers over its nuclear programme that collapsed a year ago, although it has yet to make any formal step in that direction. (AFP Photo/Majid Asgaripour)

 

IRAN  —  Officials from the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, were scheduled on Tuesday to wrap up a three-day visit to Iran seen as a chance to defuse an intensifying international showdown over Tehran’s atomic activities.

But even as the high-stakes mission wound down, US lawmakers signalled they intended to keep up the pressure on the Islamic republic by unveiling plans for yet more economic sanctions, on top of those already infuriating Iran.

The visit came amid a building confrontation between Iran and the West, and speculation that Israel is planning military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

Iran’s foreign minister, Ali Akbar Salehi, said on Monday his country was prepared to host the International Atomic Energy Agency officials for longer, “if they want” to extend their mission.

It was not known if the offer was made officially to the IAEA team, whose visit was taking place entirely out of public view.

The IAEA has kept silent about which Iranian officials the six-person team — led by chief inspector Herman Nackaerts — was talking with or if it was inspecting any suspect nuclear sites, and media in Tehran well being kept well away.

The UN agency has said the team was to focus on suspicions set out in a November 2011 report it issued strongly suggesting Iran was researching a nuclear weapon.

Iran has called that report baseless and maintains its nuclear programme is peaceful.

Its response to recent, severe Western economic sanctions against its finance and all-important oil sectors has been to defiantly ramp up its nuclear activities.

It has started uranium enrichment at a new fortified bunker in Fordo, near its holy city of Qom, and announced that a 20-percent enriched uranium fuel plate would be inserted into its Tehran research reactor within weeks.

At the same time, though, it has vowed to keep up cooperation with the IAEA.

It has also voiced willingness to resume talks with world powers over its nuclear programme that collapsed a year ago, although it has yet to make any formal step in that direction.

Tehran’s position, repeated by Salehi, is to call on the European Union and the United States to “replace their policy of sanctions with interaction” with the Islamic republic.

But key US lawmakers on Monday said a senate banking commission would soon vote a text to punish Iran further with more economic and political sanctions.

The legislation “sends a clear signal through strong measures that Iran must abandon its nuclear weapons program and its designs for the spread of international terror,” said the top Republican senator on the panel, Richard Shelby.

The bill targets firms that have anything to do with helping Iran mine, produce or transport uranium anywhere in the world.

It also requires US-listed companies to disclose if they or their affiliates could have run afoul of US sanctions on Iran by investing in energy investments, or through the sale of communications monitoring or surveillance technology.

The bill would additionally deny US visas to Iranian students wanting to study in energy-related fields if it is deemed they plan to return to work in Iran’s energy sector or nuclear programme.

And it would tighten sanctions on Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards, including targeting “anyone who materially assists” the Guards.   (*)

 

 

 

SOURCE : AFP

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Discusses Defense Issues on ‘60 Minutes’

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Discusses Defense Issues on ‘60 Minutes’

 

VIDEO : At Home With Leon Panetta

 

WASHINGTON, Jan. 30, 2012 – U.S. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta called his role in taking down Osama bin Laden a high point in his career, but also shared his belief that someone in the Pakistani government knew of the al-Qaida leader’s whereabouts before the raid during an interview that aired last night on CBS’ “60 Minutes.”

“In the 40 years I’ve been in government, this, for me, was probably the most remarkable operation that I was a part of, because everybody played their role in a very effective and responsible way,” Panetta told Scott Pelley during the far-ranging interview.

Panetta, who was CIA director when the May 2, 2011, raid took place, said he recognized the high stakes of the mission while advocating it to President Barack Obama.

“The risks were enormous: going in that far, the prospect of detection, the prospect that … one of these helicopters might go down, the fact that once [Navy SEAL Team 6] arrived there, we might … have a shooting war with the Pakistanis take place,” Panetta said.

But the secretary added that available intelligence convinced him it was time to act.

“This was the best case we had on bin Laden since Tora Bora,” he said. That area along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border was where the United States had its last good lead on bin Laden in 2001.

“And because of that — because for 10 years we had run into dead ends trying to track bin Laden down — I thought for that reason alone, we had a responsibility to act,” Panetta said.
Asked why he chose not to inform the Pakistani government in advance, Panetta acknowledged his belief that it could have compromised the plan.

“I personally have always felt that somebody [within the Pakistani government] must have had some sense of what was happening at his compound,” about a mile from Pakistan’s military academy, Panetta told Pelley. “Don’t forget, this compound had 18-foot walls around it — 12-foot walls in some areas, 18-foot walls elsewhere — [and] a seven-foot wall on the third balcony of the house. It was the largest compound in the area. So you would have thought that somebody would have asked the question, ‘What the hell’s going on there?’”

In fact, he said, surveillance before the raid showed Pakistani military helicopters flying over the compound. “And for that reason, it concerned us that, if we, in fact, brought [the Pakistani government] into it, that they might … give bin Laden a heads up,” he said.

The secretary emphasized that he doesn’t have any hard evidence that the Pakistani government knew bin Laden’s location. “So I can’t say it for a fact,” he said.

“There’s nothing that proves the case,” Panetta said. “But, as I said, my personal view is that somebody somewhere probably had that knowledge.”

Meanwhile, Panetta said, the U.S. effort to track down al-Qaida continues.

“Obviously we’re going after al-Qaida, wherever they’re at,” he said. “And clearly, we’re confronting al-Qaida in Pakistan. We’re confronting the nodes of al-Qaida in Yemen, in Somalia, in North Africa.”

Turning to Iran, Panetta said the United States has made clear that it will do whatever is necessary to keep Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

“That’s a red line for us. And it’s a red line, obviously, for the Israelis, so we share a common goal here,” he said. “If they proceed and we get intelligence that they’re proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop it. … There are no options that are off the table.”

Current thinking is that if Iran continues moving forward, “it would probably take them about a year to be able to produce a bomb, and then possibly another one to two years in order to put it on a deliverable vehicle of some sort in order to deliver that weapon,” the secretary said.

Panetta also addressed challenges closer to home as he oversees major reductions within the Defense Department budget.
“The reality is that we now are facing, as a result of congressional action, having to take down the defense budget by … well over $450 billion over the next 10 years,” he said. “We’ll have to make some very tough decisions about how we do this.”

But Panetta added that he wants to ensure he doesn’t create a hollow military in the process.

“The last thing I want to do is to make the mistakes of the past,” he said. “We still have to have a military that protects us against a lot of threats that are out there: terrorism, Iran, North Korea, nuclear proliferation, problem of cyber attacks, rising powers like China.”

As difficult as the demands are, Panetta said, the hardest part of his job is knowing that he’s signing the orders that put America’s military men and women in harm’s way, and trying to bring comfort to families of the fallen.

“The toughest thing in this job, frankly, is writing the condolence letters to the parents of those young men and women who are killed in action,” he told Pelley. “And that loss, having been a parent of somebody who has been stationed over there, you know what that means.

“But I also say to them, … ‘Your son or daughter is really a true hero and patriot, because they were willing to give their life for their country. And that means that they’ll never be forgotten,’” Panetta continued. “And I hope that’s some measure of comfort for them — because, in the end, the only comfort I have is to know that these kids, when they put their lives on the line, are helping America be strong for the future.”  (*)

 

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta Discusses Defense Issues on ‘60 Minutes’

 

The following script is from “Defense Secretary Panetta” which aired on Jan. 29, 2012. Scott Pelley is the correspondent. Henry Schuster, producer.

No one would have picked a 73-year-old, affable, former congressman as the one to track down Osama bin Laden. But Leon Panetta has held the toughest jobs in Washington and quietly done what seems impossible. Before bin Laden, Panetta helped balance the federal budget. In a long career he’d been budget director and White House chief of staff, but by 1997 he left Washington and went home to California. It was 12 years later, President-elect Obama made an odd request. Would Panetta lead the CIA? Panetta had never worked in intelligence but his team put a Navy Seal in bin Laden’s bedroom. This summer the president made Panetta secretary of defense, in charge of managing three million employees, fighting three wars, and stopping Iran from building an atom bomb.

This last Tuesday, before the president spoke to the nation, he had a few words for Leon Panetta.

[President Obama: Good job tonight, good job.]

With nearly the entire government assembled for the State of the Union address maybe 10 people in the room knew what that was about. The Navy’s Seal Team Six had just rescued two hostages, including an American woman. This time the action was in Somalia.

Scott Pelley: In how many countries are we currently engaged in a shooting war?

Leon Panetta: It’s a good question. That’s– you know, it’s–

Pelley: You have to stop and count.

Panetta: Gotta stop– I’ll have to stop and think about that, because you know, obviously we’re going after al Qaeda, wherever they’re at. And clearly, we’re confronting al Qaeda in Pakistan. We’re confronting the nodes of al Qaeda in Yemen, in Somalia, in North Africa.

When you’re secretary of defense it’s a small world and a dangerous one. Panetta was covering it when we caught up with him on a trip to Afghanistan, where he has 90,000 troops, Iraq, where the war was ending, and Libya where he’d helped depose Qaddafi. Panetta travels on a flying command post, where he can reach every American warplane, submarine and missile silo. If the president ordered a nuclear war, Panetta would launch it from what they call the doomsday plane.

Pelley: The president would reach you on this aircraft.

Panetta: The president would reach me on this aircraft and very possibly be on this aircraft, to be able to direct what happens in that situation.

We noticed Panetta’s Spartan compartment is built for two. Two chairs, two bunks, two phones – for him and the president. But on this trip Panetta wasn’t worried about Russia’s thousands of nuclear weapons, he was thinking of what he would do if Iran built just one.

Panetta: The United States, and the president’s made this clear, does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That’s a red line for us. And it’s a red line obviously for the Israelis so we share a common goal here. If we have to do it, we will do it.

Pelley: What is it?

Panetta: If they proceed and we get intelligence that they’re proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop it.

Pelley: Including military steps?

Panetta: There are no options that are off the table.

We were surprised to hear how far he thinks Iran has come.

Panetta: The consensus is that, if they decided to do it, it would probably take them about a year to be able to produce a bomb and then possibly another one to two years in order to put it on a deliverable vehicle of some sort in order to deliver that weapon.

Of course, Panetta knows more than he tells. Maybe he knows who’s bombing Iranian scientists, why Iran’s missile facility mysteriously blew up or how a computer virus wrecked Iran’s uranium enrichment plant. Judging from the U.S. spy drone that fell in Iran, America and its allies are waging war without sending thousands of troops.

The doomsday plane is laden with secret gear, we can’t show you most of it. It’s so heavy the Air Force refueled it twice in the night sky over the Atlantic. It turns out the lightest thing on board was the heart of the man with a world of worry.

Pelley: How do you launch the nuclear response from this airplane? You pick up this phone?

Panetta: Don’t touch anything Scott. (laugh)

Leon Panetta is rarely far from an eyelid collapsing, ground shaking, belly laugh. It’s involuntary and to people around him its reassuring that, with lives at stake, he stays in touch with his humanity and where he came from.

Leon Panetta lives on the farm where he grew up. He and his brother planted these walnut trees, 65 years ago, with their father, and the Panetta’s stick to their roots in northern California. He and his wife Sylvia raised three boys here; one of whom served in Afghanistan. Panetta’s parents had arrived here from Italy without a word of English.

Pelley: Did you pick the walnuts?

Panetta: Used to pick ‘em all the time. My dad used to have a pole and hook, and shake every one of these branches, and hit the walnuts. And my brother and I used to be underneath collecting the walnuts, putting ‘em in sacks. And, you know, my dad often said I was well-trained to go to Washington because I’d been dodging these nuts all my life.

His mother wanted a pianist. But Panetta orchestrated a run for Congress and, for 16 years, represented his home district. He became President Clinton’s budget director and worked with Congress to balance the federal budget for the only time in the last 42 years.

Pelley: A lot of people were surprised when your name came up for director of Central Intelligence.

Panetta: I was kind of surprised, as well. I spent most of my life working on budget issues and thought that you know, that would more likely be an area that they might want me. But the president said, “I need somebody who can restore the credibility of the CIA.” And for me, that represented a challenge.

The first challenge, ordered by the president, was to rethink the search for Osama bin Laden. There hadn’t been a good lead since the U.S. lost him in 2001 in the mountains of Tora Bora, Afghanistan. Within a year and a half of Panetta taking over as director of Central Intelligence, the U.S. tracked al Qaeda couriers to a house in a town callled Abbottabad, deep inside Pakistan. Panetta sent satellites, drones, officers and spies to watch it for eight months, but they were never sure that bin Laden was there.

On April 30th, 2011, Mr. Obama and Panetta made a point of being seen at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner. Panetta’s belly laugh was heard at every presidential punch line, but both men knew they’d just pulled the trigger. Seal Team Six would launch in 16 hours.

Panetta: The risks are, were, enormous, you know, going in that far, the prospect of detection, the prospect that, you know, one of these helicopters might go down, the fact that once they arrived there, we might, you know, have a shooting war with Pakistanis take place.

Pelley: With all of those risks you were facing, you recommended going ahead with this, to the president. Why?

Panetta: You know, in the 40 years I’ve been in government this, for me, was probably the most remarkable operation that I was a part of because everybody played their role in a very effective and responsible way. This was the best case we had on bin Laden since Tora Bora. And because of that, because for 10 years we had run into dead ends trying to track bin Laden down, I thought for that reason alone, we had a responsibility to act.

This is Panetta running the mission from CIA headquarters. He acted without telling our Pakistani allies. Because Panetta couldn’t figure how bin Laden lived more than five years, undetected, about a mile from Pakistan’s military academy – it’s West Point.

Pelley: Elements of the Pakistani government knew he was there?

Panetta: I personally have always felt that somebody must have had some sense of what was happening at this compound. Don’t forget, this compound had 18 foot walls around it. Twelve foot walls in some areas, 18 foot walls elsewhere, a seven foot wall on the third balcony of the house. It was the largest compound in the area. So you would have thought that somebody would have asked the question, “What the hell’s goin’ on there?”

Pelley: Is that why you recommended we not tell the Pakistanis that we were coming?

Panetta: We had seen some military helicopters actually going over this compound.

Pelley: Pakistani military helicopters?

Panetta: And for that reason, it concerned us that, if we, in fact, brought ‘em into it, that they might give him, give bin Laden a heads up.

Pelley: I appreciate the diplomatic problems you have, Mr. Secretary, but everything you’re telling me in this interview indicates that the Pakistani government knew he was there and that that’s what you believe.

Panetta: I don’t have any hard evidence, so I can’t say it for a fact. There’s nothing that proves the case. But as I said, my personal view is that somebody somewhere probably had that knowledge.

And there is one thing more Secretary Panetta noticed after the raid. There was no escape route from the house, it’s as if the occupant was expecting plenty of warning. Today, the house is also short one brick. Hanging on the wall of his office, Panetta has a memento that CIA officers brought him. Labeled it bin Laden’s code name: Geronimo, Abbottabad Pakistan.

Before the raid, President Obama nominated Panetta for secretary of defense. He took office over seven months ago, arriving these days at the Pentagon at dawn and working well into the night.

Last weekend, Panetta was aboard the USS Enterprise in the Atlantic Ocean, they even let the boss clear one of his planes to land.

He may be directing shadow wars in more places than he can count but one of his biggest challenges now is to manage the massive budget cuts in his big-ticket military ordered by Congress.

Panetta: The reality is that we now are facing, as a result of congressional action, having to take down the defense budget by, you know, well over $450 billion, over the next 10 years.

Pelley: And that will mean what?

Panetta: We’ll have to make some very tough decisions about how we do this. The last thing I want to do is to make the mistakes of the past. We still have to protect the best military in the world, we still have to have a military that protects us against a lot of threats that are out there, terrorism, Iran, North Korea, nuclear proliferation, problem of cyber attacks, rising powers like China.

That’s quite a list, for the globe trotting secretary of defense but the toughest part of the job is right here, at his desk.

Pelley: In your long career in government you’ve never had to make decisions of life and death.

Panetta: In some ways, in this job, I am doing that every day. And the toughest thing in this job frankly is writing the condolence letters to the parents of those young men who are killed in action. And that loss, having been a parent of someone who is stationed over there, you know what that means. But I also say to them, “You know, your son or daughter is really a true hero and patriot because they were willing to give their life for their country. And that means that they’ll never be forgotten.” And I hope that’s some measure of comfort for them. Because, in the end, it’s the only comfort I have is to know that these kids, when they put their lives on the line, are helping America be strong for the future.  (*)

 

 

SOURCE : CBS

 

 

 

Obama Selalu Tahu Bagaimana Berkomunikasi Yang Menyentuh Hati Pemilihnya

Presiden Amerika Serikat Barack Obama saat berada di ruang kerjanya, 18 Januari 2012

 

Youtube :  Your Interview with the President – 2012

President Barack Obama Hangs Out With America

 

Jakarta, 31 Januari 2012 (KATAKAMI.COM) — Bisakah dibayangkan, seorang Presiden dari sebuah negara adidaya yang sangat berkuasa seperti Amerika, berdialog langsung dengan rakyatnya melalui kecanggihan teknologi dan disiarkan langsung selama hampir satu jam penuh ?

Itulah yang terjadi di Amerika Serikat pada Hari Senin (30/1/2012) malam waktu setempat, saat Presiden ke 44 Amerika Serikat, Barack Obama, memberikan kesempatan secara langsung kepada rakyatnya untuk melakukan “wawancara” langsung kepada sang presiden melalui situs jejaring sosial Google, Google plus, dan disiarkan langsung oleh Youtube.

Durasi waktu dari wawancara langsung secara keroyokan melawan satu orang Barack Obama ini, berdurasi waktu sekitar 50 menit 47 detik.

Gedung Putih mengumumkan bahwa sesungguhnya ada lebih dari 227.000 pertanyaan yang didaftarkan untuk dijawab oleh Obama dalam interaksi langsung yang sangat pantas diacungi jempol ini.

Terlihat dari tayangan langsung yang disiarkan Youtube selama hampir satu jam, Obama duduk dengan tenang di ruang Roosevelt (Gedung Putih).

Matanya fokus menatap ke kamera dan layar monitor, tanpa ada sedetikpun waktu yang menunjukkan bahwa Obama tidak konsentrasi pada interaksi yang sangat menarik ini.

Obama terlihat fokus, konsentrasi, rileks dan bersikap apa adanya sehingga gaya yang ia tampilkan pada penampilannya kali ini sangat baik.

Obama menyapa setiap penanya dan menampilkan keramahan yang menjadi ciri khas Obama selama ini

Ia juga menjawab secara langsung pertanyaan demi pertanyaan.

 

Wawancara langsung Presiden Barack Obama melalui Youtube dan Google, 30 Januari 2012

 

Termasuk di dalamnya, Obama membenarkan bahwa pesawat tanpa awak milik militer Amerika secara rutin melakukan serangan yang menyasar kelompok yang dicurigai sebagai militan di wilayah Pakistan.

Obama menyebut serangan itu “mengincar sejumlah orang yang masuk dalam daftar teroris yang aktif.”
 
Sebelumnya, Amerika tidak pernah mengungkapkan kepada publik tentang operasi pesawat tanpa awak ini.

Lebih dari 130.000 pertanyaan masuk sebelum acara itu dimulai dan enam orang pengguna situs itu diundang bergabung dalam acara  perbincangan video selama satu jam dalam situs jejaring sosial milik Google, Google+ dan juga disiarkan secara langsung melalui Youtube.

Ketika salah seorang penanya meminta penjelasan dari Obama soal aksi serangan pesawat tanpa awak di wilayah Pakistan yang cenderung meningkat saat dia menjabat sebagai Presiden AS, Obama mengatakan “banyak serangan sudah dilakukan di Fata atau salah satu wilayah kesukuan Pakistan.
 
“Serangan itu mengincar tersangka anggota al-Qaeda yang berada di daerah yang sangat sulit di sepanjang wilayah perbatasan Pakistan dan Afghanistan,” kata Obama.

“Bagi kami jika menggunakan cara lain mungkin akan lebih banyak melibatkan aksi militer dan personil dibandingkan dengan cara yang kami gunakan selama ini (menggunakan pesawat tanpa awak).” 

 

Barack Obama

 

 

Yang ingin disampaikan disini adalah apresiasi pada cara Obama membangun komunikasi secara langsung dengan rakyatnya yang sedang diupayakannya secara terus menerus untuk kembali memilihnya pada pemilihan umum kepresidenan yang akan kembali menempatkan Obama secara calon presiden dari Partai Demokrat.

Obama menjaga secara baik kepercayaan dirinya saat kandidat-kandidat calon presiden dari Partai Republik ramai-ramai mencari peluang untuk menyerang Obama lewat berbagai kritikan yang terkesan selalu menyalahkan kebijakan sang presiden.

Yang patut digaris-bawahi disini adalah Obama tidak kehilangan akal untuk selalu menempatkan komunikasi dua arah yang sangat terjaga kualitasnya antara dirinya dan para pendukungnya.

Sebelumnya yaitu tanggal 19 Januari lalu, Obama bisa dengan sangat mengejutkan tampil di hadapan para pendukungnya di Teater Apollo, New York, menyanyikan lagu dari Al Green yang berjudul “Let’s Stay Together”.

Walau hanya dinyanyikan satu kalimat, “I AM SO IN LOVE WITH YOU” tetapi kemunculan Obama bernyanyi seperti itu tetap menjadi berita yang cukup menarik.

Dan kabarnya, penjualan album Al Green yang membawakan lagu yang dinyanyikan Barack Obama pun ikut diuntungkan karena menjadi laris manis di pasaran.

 

Presiden Barack Obama didampingi Ibu Negara Michelle Obama saat keduanya muncul dalam video pidato mingguan Obama edisi Natal 2011

 

Saat salah seorang peserta interaksi tanya-jawab dengan Obama di Youtube meminta Obama menunjukkan kemampuannya untuk menari, Obama menolak secara halus dengan mengatakan bahwa isterinya, Michelle Obama, yang jauh lebih lihai dalam menari.

Tetapi Obama berjanji dalam kemunculannya dalam interaksi di Google +, ia bersedia untuk kembali bernyanyi !

Obama, selalu tahu cara membangun komunikasi yang mampu menarik hati rakyat yang diharapkan akan kembali memilihnya untuk putaran kedua kepemimpinannya.

Dan cara-cara komunikasi yang hidup dan dinamis seperti ini memang perlu dipertahankan Obama agar ia tidak kehilangan kesempatan demi kesempatan untuk selalu meningkatkan jumlah pendukungnya di akar rumput.

Semua kalangan dirangkul.

Semua topik dimungkinkan untuk dibahas dan ditanyakan secara langsung kepada sang presiden.

Sepuluh bulan menjelang pemilihan umum, Obama ditantang untuk selalu mampu menghadirkan semua cara berinteraksi yang penuh kualitas kepada para pemilihnya.

Dan baru bulan pertama di tahun 2012 ini, tercatat sudah dua kali Obama mengejutkan publik dengan gayanya yang sangat “manis”.

Menyanyi dan berinteraksi langsung selama satu jam di Youtube dan Google +.

 

Presiden Barack Obama sekeluarga. Paling kiri Michelle Obama, Malia Obama, dan paling kanan adalah Sasha Obama.

 

Publik tentu akan terus menunggu, kejutan-kejutan apalagi yang akan dihadirkan oleh Obama di hari-hari mendatang.

Tetapi diatas semua itu, Obama tetap harus menjaga setiap kebijakan yang diambilnya sebagai seorang Presiden.

Ia tak boleh gegabah dalam mengambil kebijakan apapun, termasuk kebijakan-kebijakan luar negerinya, agar kelak jangan menjadi batu sandungan yang dapat mengurangi kans Obama untuk menang di putaran kedua pemerintahannya yang sudah didepan mata.

Jadi, untuk sementara waktu ini, penampilan Obama masih tetap menarik dan menyentuh hati.

Cara-cara yang dipilihnya untuk membangun komunikasi dengan para pendukungnya tetap patut diacungi jempol.

Dua jempol malah untuk Obama.

Ada kedekatan yang sungguh natural dan keakraban yang dimunculkan seakan dibuat mengalir seperti air. Dengan demikian, publik (terutama para pendukungnya) dibuat untuk selalu merasa nyaman dan dimanusiakan oleh cara-cara Obama yang “friendly”.

Dimana setiap mata para pendukung yang memandang pada penampilan Obama yang selalu penuh kejutan ini, diajak untuk ikut bernyanyi dalam hati mereka masing-masing (seperti yang pernah dinanyikan juga oleh Obama)  :

“I am so in love with you too, (Mr President) !”

 

 

(MS)

EU bids to bury deficits, end Greek debt drama

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and European Council President Herman Van Rompuy (R) hold a joint news conference after an European Union summit in Brussels January 30, 2012. European leaders agreed on a permanent rescue fund for the euro zone on Monday and 25 of the 27 EU states backed a German-inspired pact for stricter budget discipline, but they struggled to reconcile fiscal austerity with economic growth. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

 

EU leaders closed one chapter in the debt crisis late Monday with a new treaty supposed to end deficits — then launched a big final push to resolve Greece’s bailout woes.

European Union president Herman Van Rompuy called for a new deal with Athens “by the end of the week” on the conditions underpinning the long-delayed second bailout for Greece.

Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos went immediately into post-summit talks with top officials from the EU and the European Central Bank (ECB).

In October last year, Greece was promised a second bailout of 130 billion euros ($171 billion) if it could convince private investors to write off 100 billion euros of debt.

That deal is still to be finalised, as is a reassessment of Greece’s debt sustainability.

Eurozone partners’ handling of the Greece issue in the intervening months reached a nadir when Germany at the weekend suggested placing the Athens government under wardenship.

“It would not be reasonable, not democratic and not efficient,” French President Nicolas Sarkozy said of the plan put to finance ministries.

Greece’s education minister had called the idea “the product of a sick imagination,” and although Sweden and others showed sympathy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel did not push the plan further on this occasion.

Her finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told the Wall Street Journal that “unless Greece implements the necessary decisions and doesn’t just announce them … there’s no amount of money that can solve the problem.”

 

EU heads of state pose for a group photo at an EU summit in Brussels on Monday, Jan. 30, 2012. Front row left to right, Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis, Greek Prime Minister Lucas Papademos, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, Denmark's Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy, Cypriot President Dimitris Christofias, Romanian President Traian Basescu, European Parliament President Martin Schultz, Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny, Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti, Luxembourg's Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker and Slovakian Prime Minister Iveta Radicova. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

 

The EU focus on bailouts was supposed to give way at Monday’s summit to a renewed push to stimulate growth and create jobs across European economies.

This idea even saw tentative moves to place an ambitious free-trade deal with the United States on the coming agenda.

But at its root was the announcement that 25 countries, even if one less than thought, had adopted the new pact on budgetary discipline.

The Czech Republic joined Britain on the outside looking in, but a threat by Poland to withdraw evaporated after France gave ground in an argument about giving non-euro countries a seat at future summits to decide eurozone economic governance.

Pushed by Germany and the ECB, the treaty — to be formally signed in March — will require governments to introduce laws on balanced budgets and impose near automatic sanctions on countries that violate deficit rules.

It will enter force after 12 nations ratify it, and only those countries that sign up will be able to access bailout aid from a new rescue fund whose legal basis was also ticked off at the talks.

With Italy and Spain still fragile, EU leaders also set up a permanent rescue fund to begin operations a year early in July, although they will discuss before then whether to boost its size from an initial 500 billion euro target.

Leaders had begun their day landing on a military airstrip to beat a Belgian general strike that grounded most public transport in protest at a new round of EU-ordered austerity.

European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso said 82 billion euros of unspent EU funds could be used to kick-start growth and job creation — but with the catch that money is matched locally.

Stocks slid awaiting news on Greece, and Spain plunged quicker into what Brussels deems a “moderate” recession looming large over Europe.

In London, the FTSE 100 index of leading shares closed down 1.09 percent to 5,671.09 points. In Paris, the CAC-40 index shed 1.60 percent at 3,265.64 points and in Frankfurt the DAX 30 fell 1.04 percent at 6,444.45 points.

Leaders, some facing imminent re-election campaigning, must contend with an unemployment rate averaging 10 percent across the 17-nation eurozone.

They issued a statement on boosting growth in Europe, including such ideas as lowering the tax burden on employers to get more people hired, and giving all young people guaranteed options in work, training or study.

“There are no quick fixes. Our action must be determined, persistent and broad-based. We must do more to get Europe out of the crisis,” the joint statement said.  (*)

 

 

SOURCE : AFP

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Prince Harry: Queen needs husband for her work

Britain's Queen Elizabeth (6th R) and her husband Prince Philip (4th R) and members of the Royal family watch a fly-past from the balcony of Buckingham Palace after attending the Trooping the Colour ceremony in central London in this June 11, 2011 file photo. (L-R) Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, Prince William, Sophie, Duchess of Wessex, Prince Edward, Louise Windsor, Tim Lawrence, Princess Anne, Queen Elizabeth, Prince Harry, Prince Philip, Prince Andrew, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall and Prince Charles. Prince Philip was taken to a specialist heart hospital December 23, 2011 for tests after suffering chest pains, Buckingham Palace said. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez/Files

 

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s Prince Harry says be believes Queen Elizabeth II’s husband is so important to her that she could not carry out her public duties without him.

In rare public comments about his grandparents, Harry highlighted the role of Prince Philip in supporting the queen on her many duties, including occasional visits abroad and hosting foreign dignitaries. He also paid tribute to the monarch’s hard work ethic despite her age.

“These are the things that, at her age, she shouldn’t be doing, yet she’s carrying on and doing them,” he said in an interview with The Radio Times published Tuesday.

“Regardless of whether my grandfather seems to be doing his own thing … The fact that he’s there — personally, I don’t think that she could do it without him, especially when they’re both at this age,” Harry added.

At 85, Elizabeth is Britain’s second longest-serving monarch after Queen Victoria. Her 60th year on the throne — called the Diamond Jubilee — will be celebrated this year in major events both in Britainand in Commonwealth nations around the world.

The monarch has been supported in most of her duties and overseas trips by Philip, who turned 90 last June. Although he had expressed a desire to scale down his royal engagements, last year the pair still made a historic trip to Ireland, hosted a state visit by U.S. President Barack Obama and visited Australia on a 10-day tour.

Philip, who is known to be active and robust, suffered a health scare before Christmas when he went to the hospital complaining of chest pains. He recovered after undergoing a successful coronary stent procedure.

The royal has resumed his official duties and in the next few months, he will accompany the queen on travels throughout Britain, while their children and grandchildren plan to travel around Commonwealth countries to mark the Jubilee.

Harry’s comments were part of a series of interviews conducted for an article on the queen published in the Radio Times. The report also quoted Prince William, Prime Minister David Cameron and his predecessor Tony Blair on their impressions of the monarch.  (*)

 

 

SOURCE : AP
Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

President Barack Obama Hangs Out With America

President Barack Obama participates in an interview with YouTube and Google+ to discuss his State of the Union Address, in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, Jan. 30, 2012. The interview is held through a Google+ Hangout, making it the first completely virtual interview from the White House. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

 

 

Washington  —  Just after 5:30 PM ET today, U.S. President Barack Obama sat down for a discussion with a group of Americans from across the country in a Google+ Hangout. It was the first online conversation to happen at the White House in real time — ever.

Even before the event, more than 227,000 people had taken time to participate — submitting questions for the President to answer or voting for their favorite.  (*)

 

 

 

 

 

Obama works to save jobs, 1 at a time

Obama Hosts Virtual Google+ Hangout

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is trying to rebuild the American economy, one job at a time – literally.

The president asked an online town hall questioner Monday to send him her husband’s resume, insisting he wanted to look into why the man remained out of work despite his background as a semiconductor engineer.

“I meant what I said, if you send me your husband’s resume, I’d be interested in finding out exactly what’s happening right there,” Obama told the questioner, Jennifer Weddel of Fort Worth, Texas.

He told Weddel that according to what he was hearing from industry, such high-tech fields are in great demand and her husband “should be able to find something right away.”

Weddel told Obama that despite what he said, her husband had been out of work for three years. She wanted to know why foreign workers were getting visas for high-skilled work.

The exchange came as Obama appeared in a live video chat room known as a “Hangout,” part of online search giant Google’s social networking site Google Plus. He was answering questions submitted via the Google Inc.-owned video site YouTube, as well as interacting live with Weddel and four others in the Hangout.

The post-State of the Union session was part of the White House focus on social media. In past such events – with Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and earlier YouTube sessions following previous State of the Union addresses – Obama answered questions that had been submitted via online networks. But Monday’s event allowed him to interact with a selection of his questioners, leading to more substantive exchanges as they pushed him on his stances.

Weddel’s insistence that the president’s claims about the demand for high-skilled workers weren’t being born out for her husband led to the president’s offer to take a look at his resume.

 

US President Barack Obama participates in an interview with YouTube and Google from the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, January 30, 2012, as seen on a laptop in the Brady Press Briefing Room. The interview, held through a Google+ Hangout, marks the first completely virtual interview of a US President from the White House. AFP PHOTO / Saul LOEB

 

“I’ll have to take you up on that,” she told him. And Obama came back to it after covering a range of issues in the 45-minute session, telling Weddel, “Remember to send me that information!”

Obama got a variety of questions on the economy, and defended his policies on small businesses and innovation. An Occupy protester sent in a video saying she was out of work and asking Obama: “I need help. I’m 53. What am I going to do?”

The president’s response, in part: “The most important thing I can do for folks who are out of work right now is grow the economy.”

Obama was also asked to justify his administration’s use of unmanned drone strikes, and contended they were being used judiciously. “I think that there’s a perception somehow that we’re just sending in a whole bunch of strikes willy-nilly,” Obama said. “This is a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists who are trying to go in and harm Americans.”

And he was asked about online piracy. Congress recently delayed action on legislation cracking down on online piracy after opposition from Internet companies including Google.

Obama said he thought it was possible to protect intellectual property that creates jobs in the U.S., while still respecting the integrity of the Internet as an open system.

The exchanges came a day ahead of the Republican primary in Florida, as GOP presidential hopefuls attack Obama daily. But none of the questions put to him were about the presidential race. They were about the State of the Union and people’s lives now.

There were also light moments, as Weddel asked Obama if he would show off his dance moves (the president refused, saying the first lady mocks his dancing) and another questioner asked the president how he and Michelle Obama planned to celebrate their 20th wedding anniversary this fall (since it’s shortly before the election, Obama said he wasn’t sure how romantic it would be).

More than 133,000 questions were submitted and voted on by YouTube users. Google officials selected the questions to ask based in part on those results.

Although many of the questions that appeared online were about Obama’s stance on legalizing marijuana – something he has said he opposes when asked in the past – that did not come up Monday. Organizers said the No. 1 voted question was about the potential extradition to the U.S. of Richard O’Dwyer, a British student accused of setting up a website that gave people access to films and TV shows for free in violation of copyright laws.

Obama said he wasn’t personally involved in the case but the administration wanted to ensure that intellectual property is protected “in a way that’s consistent with Internet freedom.”  (*)

 

 

SOURCE : AP

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Obama responds to questions through Google site; Offers to forward resume of unemployed worker

US President Barack Obama participates in an interview with YouTube and Google from the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, January 30, 2012, as seen on a laptop in the Brady Press Briefing Room. The interview, held through a Google+ Hangout, marks the first completely virtual interview of a US President from the White House. AFP PHOTO / Saul LOEB

 

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is trying to rebuild the American economy, one job at a time —literally.

The president asked an online town hall questioner Monday to send him her husband’s resume, insisting he wanted to look into why the man remained out of work despite his background as a semiconductor engineer.

“I meant what I said, if you send me your husband’s resume, I’d be interested in finding out exactly what’s happening right there,” Obama told the questioner, Jennifer Weddel of Fort Worth, Texas.

He told Weddel that according to what he was hearing from industry, such high-tech fields are in great demand and her husband “should be able to find something right away.”

Weddel told Obama that despite what he said, her husband had been out of work for three years. She wanted to know why foreign workers were getting visas for high-skilled work.

The exchange came as Obama appeared in a live video chat room known as a “Hangout,” part of online search giant Google’s social networking site Google Plus. He was answering questions submitted via the Google Inc.-owned video site YouTube, as well as interacting live with Weddel and four others in the Hangout.

The post-State of the Union session was part of the White House focus on social media. But whereas in past such events — with Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and earlier YouTube sessions following previous State of the Union addresses — Obama answered questions that had been submitted via online networks, Monday’s event allowed him to interact with a selection of his questioners, leading to more substantive exchanges as they pushed him on his stances.

Weddel’s insistence that the president’s claims about the demand for high-skilled workers weren’t being born out for her husband led to the president’s offer to take a look at his resume.

“I’ll have to take you up on that,” she told him. And Obama came back to it after covering a range of questions in the 45-minute session, telling Weddel, “Remember to send me that information!”

Obama got a range of questions on the economy, including those about his policies on small businesses, the auto bailout and how to talk with children about such issues. An Occupy protester sent in a YouTube video saying she was out of work and asking Obama: “I need help. I’m 53. What am I going to do?”

The president’s response, in part: “The most important thing I can do for folks who are out of work right now is grow the economy.”

Obama was also asked to justify his administration’s use of unmanned drone strikes, and contended they were being used judiciously. And he was asked about online piracy, in the wake of opposition to bills in Congress to crack down on piracy. The Senate recently delayed action in one such bill after opposition from Internet companies including Google.

Obama said he thought it was possible to protect intellectual property that creates jobs in the U.S., but to do so in a way that doesn’t affect the fundamental integrity of the Internet as an open system.

The exchanges came a day ahead of the Republican primary in Florida, as GOP presidential hopefuls daily attack Obama over his stewardship of the still-lagging economy. But none of the questions put to him were about the presidential race. They were about the State of the Union and people’s lives now.

More than 133,000 questions were submitted and voted on by YouTube users. Google officials selected the questions to ask based in part on those user results.

Although many of the questions that appeared online were about Obama’s stance on legalizing marijuana — something he has said he opposes when asked in the past — that did not come up Monday. Organizers said the No. 1 voted question was about the potential extradition to the United States of Richard O’Dwyer, a British student accused of setting up a website that gave people access to films and TV shows for free in violation of copyright laws.

Obama said he wasn’t personally involved in the case but the administration wanted to ensure that intellectual property is protected “in a way that’s consistent with Internet freedom.”   (*)

 

 

SOURCE : Washington Post , AP

Posted Tuesday, January 31, 2012 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,904 other followers